Sunday, August 10, 2008

Searching for something to blame

Blaming is not always rational, nor is it a productive use of time and energy. I tend to avoid it like the plague, given my profession and the way we were raised. But, as I watch my 32 year old brother slowly fade from a horrible, and perhaps, preventable disease, the anger stirs and I find myself searching my soul for something or someone to blame, asking how on God's green earth could this be happening to my only brother. Mom's tumor surfaced seemingly out of the blue. We discovered it; we dealt with it as best we could. Craig's cancer first appeared in the Spring of 2006 -- first meaning we had dealt with it successfully. I recall it vividly and remember how Craig treated us a bit like melodramatic nuisances for having been upset at the time. Why wouldn't he? His kidney was successfully removed and he was told he had a nearly 0% chance of recurrence after having gone nearly 2 years without any indication of a "storm a brewin". Yet, at the time of plucking his left kidney from its home, the doctor noted peculiarities. It was a shriveled up, raisin of a kidney with more major arteries than normal. What that means, who really knows, but the doctor's assessment at the time indicated "one very sick kidney". The other peculiarity wouldn't be discovered until the pathology came back: the cancer was Chromophobe, the more "benign" of kidney cancer types. An excerpt taken from the Kidney Cancer Association website: "Chromophobe RCC rarely metastasizes until very late in its clinical course, and surgical removal of localized or even locally advanced disease is usually associated with an excellent prognosis. Metastatic chromophobe RCC is quite rare, and no standard therapy currently exists."

YET, it scored a IV on the Fuhrman scale. Also taken from the Kidney Cancer Association website: "Kidney cancers are usually given a Fuhrman grade on a scale of 1 through 4. Grade 1 kidney cancers have cell nuclei that look very much like a normal kidney cell nucleus. These cancers are usually slow growing and are slow to spread to other parts of the body (metastasize). They tend to have a good outlook (prognosis). Grade 4 kidney cancer, on the upper end of the Fuhrman scale, looks quite different from normal kidney cells and has a worse prognosis. Generally, the higher the Fuhrman grade the worse the prognosis." This SHOULD HAVE (maybe, perhaps) ding-donged a bell, a triangle, a bass drum that the cancer COULD come back.


Fast forward to fall 2007 when Mom was diagnosed with brain cancer. I remember Craig expressly stating that he went in to get check because he "didn't want to put the family through that with him". I remember sitting on a wall after work talking with him about his test results, results that indicated "lesions" in some of his organs. I also remember talking with mom about it and wondering whether we should be concerned. Craig went to Thailand and emailed his doctor about the results. Enter the unproductive blame game entertained right now as I sit in the doorway of my brother's darkened room where he is sleeping in a hospital bed attached to oxygen, looking like a young man dying. So, a rant:


1) When a cancer patient asks about concerning "lesions" in his report, take the point-two seconds out of your very busy life to respond, so that he might have half a f***ing fighting chance to beat the cancer.


2) If you can't do it, find a medical intern who has the professional wherewithal to respond.


--Flash forward to February time period--


3) When a cancer patient comes in with random bleed after random bleed, torn tendons for no apparent reason, weight loss like a south beach diet gone awry, ghostly complexion and complaining of stomach pain, don't assume it's an appendicitis, pancreatitis or any other "itis". Don't wonder about the gall bladder, the "bladder" bladder, or the remote chance a killer batch of exotic worms were back with a vengeance. Perhaps, instead, take a looksee at his medical history and discover the words "RENAL CARCINOMA" and perhaps run a few tests to check whether it has returned. Don't let a patient float through a handful of doctors appointments, waiting until he's literally puking his guts out to the point of delirium before the big ah-ha moment hits you. Any idiot off the street would have wondered whether the cancer had returned given those symptoms.


Perhaps, we're to blame for not insisting Craig get checked with greater furor but, heyyyy, wait a tic, he DID get checked!!!! Yes, multiple times in fact! He was checked for everything but cancer. I'm surprised a pregnancy test wasn't run.


It's unproductive and of course I don't think any one individual could have prevented the cancer from recurring, or have predicted even probable death from it. But, instead of catching it at Stage IV after all the times he inquired about his health, plenty of people could have listened once and helped catch the "rare, but won't recur" cancer at Stage "anything but terminal". Maybe, just maybe, this would have given him a fighting chance to see age 33!


If Dr. F or any of the clinicians we've met these last 5 and a half months were on the case, we would be talking about Craig's trip to the Galapagos Islands and how healthy he's doing on the first round of chemo. It's unfortunate they came on when the cards were stacked so heavily against him.


I'm sad Craig's been robbed, and it hurts like hell to envision a life without him. As senseless as it might be, I can't help but see red at the notion that this could have been prevented. The thought won't eat me up, just surfaces every now and then.


~E

8 comments:

  1. Being angry is a natural and good process for the situation you all are experiencing. Yes, anger doesn't change things per say ,yet it needs to come out of all of you at some time. We trust other people ( that is what they are people) to help us when we are sick but sometimes those people aren't up to the task to help. It would be nice if they had a scale of 1-4 so we could say I want the one with the 4 rating but we don't have the option. I'm sorry you didn't know about #4 rated Dr. F so that Craig would have gotten better care at the very beginning.
    Love
    Aunt Donna

    ReplyDelete
  2. Understand you so much! Why are some doctors wonderful while some others are idiots? How could we know? you have the rigth to be angry and so are we with you! Love
    Beatrice

    ReplyDelete
  3. Erin
    Yes, apparently there were lots of mistakes made and in hindsight it seems so obvious what was going on. Shame on those doctors for not being more diligent and not making it clear that the original diagnosis was stage IV. That would surely would have sent up red flags to be very cautious. But, Erin, I am so glad that you have come to the conclusion that the "thought won't eat me up". Would of, could of, should of, could drive all of you nuts when in fact none of you know if the outcome would have been any different for Craig. Be angry, go into a room and scream, hit a pillow. Let it out any way you can, you need to . But I hope all of you find ways to cope so you don't let it eat at you inside. Sending my thoughts for your peace.
    Love,
    Aunt Joan

    ReplyDelete
  4. Erin I hope this doesn't sound "wrong" but I am so glad to hear some anger in your voice... your Aunt Joan is right, you all need to be angry and let it out. You have every right to be *so* angry and if you just try to keep taking it, THAT is what will eat you alive inside. The things that you all have gone through... no one would wish on their worst enemy. Depression, Anger, Denial... you all know the stages but I doubt you've had time to go through any of them. I hope at some point you can go through your grieving process so that you can survive the aftermath, when the busy-ness and caretaking is said and done and you are left with silence and your own thoughts.

    I hope and hope this does not sound "preachy" but I worry about all of you and wish I could do something to help.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dearest Lawlers,
    your recent blogs leave me sobbing and applauding at the same time. My heart aches and cheers for you all at once. Searching for something to say that may offer solace, support, anything that might absorb and relieve you of some of your anguish and rage...I sense Craig wondering suggestively "so what's next?" So here goes...I listened to Living on Earth's August 8 show while fixing dinner this evening. Dr. Bernard Lown was interviewed/showcased toward the end of the show and he said something that stopped me so fully I had to write this down. Lown, by the way is a cardiologist and nobel peace prize recipient (prevention of nuclear war) and co-developer of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. He said, "I, as a doctor, realize that cure is not answer; answer is prevention and prevention is anticipation and analysis. You have to know the past." He went on to say, " Orwell ... said, 'whoever controls the past controls the future, and whoever controls the present controls the past.'" This made me think of your recent blog Erin, and your rage rant on what if and how come and if only...and I connect that to what I sense is Craig's inner question 'so what's next'. I sense this not as what's next for Craig, because I sense he's not concerned about that, but what's next here and now because of what's happening, and what about all of you. So, I ask, what would Craig do with this knowledge you have? How would he put it to use? I'm sensing that you need to direct your rage into something that will carry Craig's legacy of refined and insatiable intellect, robust physicality and adventure, the signature Lawler voice, and write/speak/teach what you are learning through this process for the benefit of anyone who happens to hear or read - like you've all done in this blog. You are not alone in your dilema of finding yourself at the end of a road that could have had other outcomes had someone who was aware of the past and paying attention to the present been AWAKE when Craig was presenting with symptoms earlier in the year. XXXXing pissed off is the understatement, ggaaawwwddd, and also a catalyst (halleluiah) for transforming this very real, raw, gutwrenching (for Craig especially) life experience into something that will serve to move the entire paradigm out dying from cancer out of ignorance. Isn't that JUST SO TRULY CRAIG! Isn't this what he'd have boxes of papers about filling his apartment and what he'd scribble about in journals? Love and Hugs from Ruby

    ReplyDelete
  6. PS: William E. Whitmore's rendition of Farther On is a gracefull blessing. Available on amazon.com.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I totally agree--I am totally pissed and do not understand "why" or how the hell this could happen!!! And--being angry has helped me--helped me learn from this and ask questions from others who are suffering through various conditions. I want to know what they did, how they felt--so maybe I can learn from it--help others or warn others. The one thing common to all readers of your blog--we have been educated by you--in a way that is not available anywhere else. Textbooks and unending research could not teach us what the Lawler family has taught us--we are seeing the third dimension that will be invaluable to many of us--given the odds. You have "earned" an education far beyond any doctorate and created a discipline that no one has even had the guts to develop. Leave it to Mary's children, thank God!! Rinda

    ReplyDelete
  8. Similar things happened with my father, as a comedy of errors of medical incompetence turned an infected toenail into a bedsore on the heel, into osteomyelitis, and finally into fatal double pneumonia; and with his father, who died of a reaction to penicillin (as the anaphylactic shock grew worse, the doc gave him more). I'm still angry about those events, and I'm angry now reading about Craig's experience. I wish there was something lasting and effective that could be done to fix this problem, as malpractice lawsuits don't seem to be much of a deterrent, expecially in the face of tort reform.

    Please convey to Craig my heartfelt greetings. I tried to contact him a few years ago when he was at that Denver law firm, but I never got through. I understand now that they kept him too busy for anything other than billing hours (I'm angry at sweatshop law firms too). I'll never forget Craig's attempt at explaining Heideggerian hermeneutics to me in Stillwater over Jagermeister and strong coffee. Both of us enjoyed in-depth conversation when drinking, although vis-a-vis him it sometimes seemed a lot like a person trying to explain algebra to a dog. I was astounded then at his brilliance, I think everyone around him was. To this day I don't think I've met anyone so brilliant.

    ReplyDelete